First Comment:
Brian - we forgot to move the version forward. At this point, the
current draft should be considered version 0.9 perhaps???
I echo Brians' sentiment. This document is awesome and I feel real
proud to have been involved with this round the clock effort. The whole
TA team has contributed during the last nine months to get us to this
point and you should all feel proud. It has been a pleasure serving on
the same committee as all of you. We still have lots of work to do.
Please be ready to roll your sleaves up and work hard on this in Tokyo.
The next steps Brian outlined must be handled very swiftly. We have a
very small window of opportunity to have this approved in Vancouver. IT
HAS to go out next week to the QRT Team for review.
I am hoping the QRT Team will like this one as we have answered their
main comments.
PLAN FOR TOKYO:
We should do a brief (less than one hour) meeting commencement then get
into the real wpork and start going through the spec, along with
comments, for the remainder of the three days.
THere should be no other business other than liaison with other groups
perhaps.
cheers (and beers!)
Duane Nickull
Brian Eisenberg wrote:
>
> Folks -
>
> I'll be harmonizing the glossary with the latest version of the TA spec this
> weekend. After I finish, I'll circulate copies to the team and we will then
> submit it to the Quality Review team on Monday, along with version 0.8.72i
> of the TA spec.
>
> Thanks to Colin for all your hard work on pulling the glossary together. I'm
> printing it out and will be syncing it up with the spec later tomorrow.
>
> Regards,
>
> Brian
