Brian,
the snippet should probably come from Nikola's draft
recommendation, not my rambling.
As for which section, since I cannot read the TOC
(no Word for Solaris last time I checked;-) I'll
leave that decision up to you folk.
If I recall earlier versions, wasn't there a conventions
section or something to that effect?
I would not place it in the compliance section, that's
something completely different.
Cheers,
Chris
> Brian Eisenberg wrote:
>
> I absolutely agree with Chris, and propose that I insert his wording into the TA spec (which I'm
> putting the finishing touches on this morning. I'll have it out to the group by the end of the day
> (Seattle time).
>
> Chris - any suggestion on what section of the document would be the best place to insert this
> snippet?
>
> Please find the attached TOC for the latest TA spec.
>
> --Brian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Ferris [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 9:35 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CC minutes
>
> Anders/team,
>
> With regards to:
>
> "Nicola reported that only one response had been received on his email on the subject, which
> should
> be called Capitalisation rather than naming convention to avoid confusion with the work being
> performed by the Core Components team on the semantic aspects.
>
> It was agreed that this should remain a task for the Technical Architecture but close cooperation
> with the other teams is needed."
>
> Why does this never seem to get resolved and finalized? There has been some
> discussion around this for as long as I can recall. We (TR&P and TP teams)
> need to have the issue resolved once and for all.
>
> I am in favor of the proposal (UpperCamelCase for Elements, lowerCamelCase
> for attributes), but without clear guidance, we're likely to end up with
> a bunch of DTD or XSD schemas which have differing capitalization schemes
> which is (IMHO) unprofessional and would reflect poorly.
>
> PLEASE make a CLEAR and UNAMBIGUOUS decision on this matter and do so
> quickly. We are trying to finalize these various DTD/XSD schemas that the
> infrastructure components define/require.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> "[email protected]" wrote:
> >
> > Please find attached the minutes from yesterday's TA conference call.
> >
> > regards
> >
> > Anders Grangard
> > Edifrance
> > Ing�nieur - Consultant en Commerce �lectronique
> > Tel: +33 (0)1 42 91 62 24
> > http://www.edifrance.org
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > Name: TA_CC_141200.doc
> > TA_CC_141200.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
> > Encoding: BASE64
>
>
>
> Name: TA TOC.doc
> TA TOC.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
> Encoding: base64
begin:vcard
n:Ferris;Christopher
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc;XTC Advanced Development
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[email protected]
title:Sr. Staff Engineer
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Christopher Ferris
end:vcard
