Anders/team,
With regards to:
"Nicola reported that only one response had been received on his email on the subject, which should
be called Capitalisation rather than naming convention to avoid confusion with the work being
performed by the Core Components team on the semantic aspects.
It was agreed that this should remain a task for the Technical Architecture but close cooperation
with the other teams is needed."
Why does this never seem to get resolved and finalized? There has been some
discussion around this for as long as I can recall. We (TR&P and TP teams)
need to have the issue resolved once and for all.
I am in favor of the proposal (UpperCamelCase for Elements, lowerCamelCase
for attributes), but without clear guidance, we're likely to end up with
a bunch of DTD or XSD schemas which have differing capitalization schemes
which is (IMHO) unprofessional and would reflect poorly.
PLEASE make a CLEAR and UNAMBIGUOUS decision on this matter and do so
quickly. We are trying to finalize these various DTD/XSD schemas that the
infrastructure components define/require.
Thanks,
Chris
"[email protected]" wrote:
>
> Please find attached the minutes from yesterday's TA conference call.
>
> regards
>
> Anders Grangard
> Edifrance
> Ing�nieur - Consultant en Commerce �lectronique
> Tel: +33 (0)1 42 91 62 24
> http://www.edifrance.org
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: TA_CC_141200.doc
> TA_CC_141200.doc Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
> Encoding: BASE64
begin:vcard
n:Ferris;Christopher
tel;cell:508-667-0402
tel;work:781-442-3063
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Sun Microsystems, Inc;XTC Advanced Development
adr:;;One Network Drive;Burlington;Ma;01803-0903;USA
version:2.1
email;internet:[email protected]
title:Senior Staff Engineer
fn:Christopher Ferris
end:vcard
