that is exactly my take.. william.... could not have said it better.... rik
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of William J.
Kammerer
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 8:25 AM
To: 'ebXML Listserv (E-mail)'; 'ebXML Marketing Awareness Education
(E-mail)'
Cc: Rik Drummond
Subject: Re: ebXML Requirements Specifications Press Release
The "Drafts: Open for Comment" page at
http://www.ebxml.org/specindex.htm is addressed "To the ebXML Work Group
Participants." They have until March 27th to respond; I responded with
some nit-picky things, but I don't feel that it is that readable of a
document to be introduced to the "world." Shouldn't we have waited
until the rest of the "ebXML Work Group Participants" had a chance to
comment and the document was updated before the press release was
issued?
And can this discussion be limited to the general ebXML mailing list and
Marketing and Awareness?
William J. Kammerer
FORESIGHT Corp.
4950 Blazer Memorial Pkwy.
Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305
(614) 791-1600
Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/
"Commerce for a New World"
-----Original Message-----
From: Rik Drummond <[email protected]>
To: Klaus <[email protected] >; Sutor <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; 'ebXML Transport
(E-mail)' <[email protected]>; 'ebXML
Repository (E-mail)' <[email protected]>; 'ebXML
Core Components (E-mail)' <[email protected]>; 'ebXML
Business Process (E-mail)' <[email protected]>; 'ebXML
Architecture (E-mail)' <[email protected]>;
'ebXML Requirements (E-mail)'
<[email protected]>; 'ebXML Marketing
Awareness Education (E-mail)' <[email protected]>;
'ebXML Listserv (E-mail)' <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, March 17, 2000 8:51 AM
Subject: RE: ebXML Requirements Specifications Press Release
may be i have a procedural misunderstanding. Now i know that everything
we do is viewable by the public... but i thought we did work in the
committee, then voted on release to the wider ebxml audience for review
and after they reviewed it then we released it to the public... what i
get from the discussion is that voting to pass it on to the wider ebxml
community is the same as going to the wider audience "officially"... is
this true? if so i would like to discuss it, because it think that will
get us in trouble....
best regards, rik
