RE: Repaired SpecModelExample XML

Jean-Jacques,

I did not notice right away that these postings are only to the BP list and
therefore, I have not forwarded all of them to the TP list.
I also have not yet analyzed them in enough detail to understand whether
they are consistent with each other.

Karsten, please make sure that any postings that the TP team should see are
posted to the TP list as well as the BP list.

Regards,
Marty

*************************************************************************************

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
*************************************************************************************



"Jean-Jacques Dubray" <[email protected]> on 12/12/2000 04:26:36 PM

Please respond to <[email protected]>

To:   Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject:  RE: Repaired SpecModelExample XML



Marty:

Which XML example are you working on, this is not the same example that
Karsten has sent Saturday. Did I miss an email on the list?

Cheers,

Jean-Jacques

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin W Sachs [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 4:15 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Repaired SpecModelExample XML

FYI

****************************************************************************

*********

Martin W. Sachs
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center
P. O. B. 704
Yorktown Hts, NY 10598
914-784-7287;  IBM tie line 863-7287
Notes address:  Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM
Internet address:  mwsachs @ us.ibm.com
****************************************************************************

*********
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM on 12/12/2000
04:15 PM ---------------------------

David RR Webber <[email protected]>@compuserve.com> on 12/12/2000
03:50:35 PM

To:   ebxml BPR <[email protected]>, ebXML Core Components
      <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject:  Repaired SpecModelExample XML



Attached is the repaired XML so at least it opens as XML.

I also fixed some of the more obvious spelling errors.

I pass no comment on the semantic quality at this point,
but at least now you can view the XML!

Maybe as well as requesting PDF for documents we
should state that XML samples should have been validated
against a validating tool prior to posting?

Thanks, DW.
(See attached file: SpecModelExampleInline01a.xml)