Jim,
Comments embedded. I would like to understand a little more on this issue.
cheers
|
|In that there are some structural differences between a ebXML document and
a
|RNet document, I do not believe that they are interexchangeable as is.
ebXML has
|added some elements and moved some others.
Are you talking about RNIF Vs ebXML TRP ? If we transport an RNO across the
wire using ebXML, then there is no difference as the ebXML header et al is
specific to the transport engine.
|from the BP Schema to RNIF or UMM. It is too early to determine,
|but I do not
|believe that this transformation can be done without lose of
|semantics between
|the two representations.
Are you talking about an RNIF engine running an ebXML BP natively ?
|
|We may be close to interoperability but not interchangeability.
|
Just to clarify (in my mind), is it your opinion that an ebXML engine can
perform RosettaNet PIP. But the artifacts of an ebXML BP model cannot be ...
? Where does the interchangeability come in ? Would appreciate your comments
because, from my limited knowledge, I thought we could model and execute RN
in ebXML with out losing any semantics and functionality.
cheers
