>> mm1: Dale,
>> In the informal F2F in late April, we discussed use of the
>> substitution groups and increasing extensibility to further support a
>> service-based approach. How does this approach align with JAXB and
>> JAX-RPC (For example, relationship of types of element in a group)?
>
> Najmi: Here is my experience with latest JAXB and JAXRPC. ebXML
> Registry 3.0 schema is using element substitution with latest JAXB
> from JWSDP 1.4 and it seems well supported. We had some trouble with
> JAXRPC but I believe that has been fixed within JAXRPC for JWSDP 1.4
> version.
>
> ebXML Registry specs use element substitution heavily for extensibility.
mm2: Thanks, Farrukh. Now, perhaps Dale can answer with the
extensibility options being placed / discussed for ebCPPA. Regards.
