Thanks for the reference.
Do you mean to make the defaults mandatory
to use for all participants in any
business process whatsoever?
I could see that your defaults
would then be relevant
to the issue I posed.
I also think you will have little
luck getting people to use them
and them alone. I would give it a .0001
on the analyst spectrum.
Dale
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd Eckenfels [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:25 AM
To: Dale Moberg
Cc: ; EDI-L, List; ebxml-dev
Subject: Re: [ebxml-dev] ebXML CPA/CPP Estimate
>
>
>Gee Berndt, I don't know how we missed this!
>Next time you should come to a meeting and
>explain to everyone what the "reasonable defaults"
>on all transport, acknowledgement, NRR,
>reliable messaging, signals, signatures,
>trust anchors, certificates, digital envelopes,
>transport security should be for all types of
>all business collaborations
>
Just read the RegRep CPA Bootstrap Draft.
Greetings
Bernd
----------------------------------------------------------------
The ebxml-dev list is sponsored by OASIS.
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.ebxml.org/ob/adm.pl>
