Next in thread → Next in month →

Re: [ebxml-dev] ebMS vs RNIF

From: James Bryce Clark <>
To: ,
Date: 2002-04-10T21:31:13Z
ID: <>
Thread: Re: [ebxml-dev] ebMS vs RNIF

I thought the two were converging, not competing. See
http ://www.rosettanet.org/rosettanet/Rooms/DisplayPages/LayoutDoc?PressRelease=com.webridge.entity.Entity[OID[1EC4B0E09B39D511BD97009027E33DD8]].
(watch for wrap)
From the ebXML BP team's side, we viewed their work as a key model and strove to maintain strong cross-compatibility. I had the same impression from the ebXML MSG team.

Also, judging by the structure of RN's nonprofit association and its licensing, I am not sure that they intended to support uses outside of their own electronic industry vertical. You might check directly with RosettaNet.

Regards Jamie Clark

At 12:47 PM 4/10/02, [email protected] wrote:

Hi,
we have an internal discussion regarding ebMS vs. RNIF. If we are not using the RosettaNet PIP's (processes and documents) - is it best to use ebMS or RNIF as wire protocol?
What are the pros & cons of using ebMS (2.0) vs. RNIF (2.0)? Does anyone have or are aware of any document comparing ebMS (ebXML Messaging Service) and RNIF (RosettaNet Implementation Framwork).
Best Regards
Lars Abrell
Telia / Skanova

~ James Bryce Clark
~ VP and General Counsel, McLure-Moynihan Inc.
~ Chair, ABA Business Law Subcommittee on Electronic Commerce
~ 1 818 597 9475   [email protected]    [email protected]
~ This message is neither legal advice nor a binding signature. Ask me why.

← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

Next in thread → Next in month →