Of
course, ebXMLGlobal (Matt) contribution to the MS Test Reqs should not be
forgotten:
Matt
provided the first cut at a list of Test Requirements, hope he does not mind the
follow-up massaging :)
Once
the test requirements are finalized, that is good enough for MS TC
release,
but
not yet for an MS Conformance test Suite: we will need to add the Test Cases
definitions, and profiles definitions...
I
think that for Version 0.1 (internal TC review) we don't need all test cases:
just a representative sample.
While
Mike / Matt finish-up the Test Reqs, I'll give a first shot at Test Cases and
submit to the list (anyone interested too?)
I just
want us to agree on the format of Test Cases, before going
further.
Regards,
jacques.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kass
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 7:30
AM
To: Jacques Durand
Cc:
''
Subject: RE:
[ebxml-iic-conform] MS Level 2 & 3 test reqs
At 08:12
PM 7/9/2002 -0700, Jacques Durand wrote:
Mike:
Great milestone, you have been key to all this !
and thanks to all who gave comments.
I see the following cosmetic remaining changes before we
have something to submit to MS TC (do we all agree
here?):
[MIKE] - Thanks also to XML Global for
providing the initial test requirements that
we have been massaging
:)
- consolidate all
these Levels in a single test req document that
ignores the notion of levels, yet keeps the organization of test reqs
by spec modules,
only for the sake of ease of
browsing.
(levels/profiles would be defined
separately, not needed for MS TC submission)
[MIKE] - I agree.
- renumber each test
req item (ID) (Matt can help on this he said?
Note:
if we use a pure sequential numbering, we should not change them
later
as these will be referenced everywhere, and
yet we should not expect them to remain
contiguous
in the test req doc, as we may have to add/remove some test reqs later
based
on feedback.)
[MIKE]
- I will leave the "merging/restructuring" of the 3 test requirements
documents and
XSL stylesheet to Matt, as he has volunteered to do the
resequencing of the test requirements.
- remove from this
final copy the "Coverage" attribute (would go to the annotated spec)
[MIKE] - This is a simple stylesheet change, as far as
rendering in HTML. However, the "coverage"
attribute is a valuable
piece of information we may want to keep in the original XML
document...
Is that fine with
everyone?
Regards,
jacques
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kass [mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 2:46 PM
To: Jacques Durand
Cc:
''
Subject:
RE: [ebxml-iic-conform] MS Level 2 & 3 test reqs
Jacques and all,
Here
are the latest versions of levels 1,2 and 3 ebXML MS Conformance
Testing Requirements.
Incorporated are changes ( and a few not ) based upon comments.
Further
modifications based
upon discussion is possible ( but we seem to be iterating to a
conclusion :)
I am also
attaching comments to Monica's and Jacques comments (
already sent out comments
for Michael Wang's
post ).
All my comments begin
with [MIKE3]
Regards,
Mike
