Jacques,
More comments. Key questions:
1) Need to assign <Manifest><Reference xlink:href
=""abc">" at the application level in order to do any
meaningful payload testing for interop, otherwise we have no way of
fetching or evaluating a particular
payload ( no CID to refer to ).
2) Fold <SetPayload> operation into <Manifest> declaration,
and eliminate <SetPayload> as an operation..
not needed, and it is cleaner.
3) Define a standard message payload format for including the digest(s)
of payloads used in the PayloadVerify
operation, consisting of a list of CIDs and their corresponding Digest
values.
Mike
At 11:40 PM 1/14/2003 -0800, Jacques Durand wrote:
Mike:
You are right for the CPA: we
assume the same on each side, for a given test case,
as usually the CPA covers a
conversation. That is anyway simpler for running the tests,
which is needed especially for
interop.
That measn our messages will
refer to same CPAId, within a test case.
Here is attached my comments
for interop test case scripts - I think we are there.
I guess we need to go through
the rest of the test cases (beyond #2 or #3) to see if
they are consistent with latest
changes. Also proper CPA names need be used.
(should we use the ones I
proposed in previous mail?)
regards,
Jacques
Attachment:
BIP_testcases_scripting_MK2_JD3_MK3.doc
Description: MS-Word document
