← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

FW: Assistance please - FW: ebXML TC review and input of the UDDI Spec TC "UDDI as the registry for ebXML components"

From
"Creininger, Lathryn Q"
Date
2003-07-09T18:47:36+00:00
ID
Thread
FW: Assistance please - FW: ebXML TC review and input of the UDDI Spec TC "UDDI as the registry for ebXML components"
Dale 
and JC,

I 
found this e-mail from Luc this morning as I was catching up on my e-mail. It 
looks like it may not have been sent to the entire JC.  

 

It 
appears to me that this e-mail contains a lot of the information we needed 
for clarification on the request from Luc.  Near the bottom of the e-mail 
he provided examples of how they would like to use URLs, keys, and 
namespaces.  Does this answer our questions on what they need from 
us?  I hesitate to send a note to Luc asking for clarification, when he 
thought he had already sent this to us.  

 

I 
suggest we all review this and discuss on e-mail to see if this answers our 
questions. Perhaps we need another short telecon this week to discuss his 
requests, and provide some answers.

 

Please 
let me know if we need additional clarification from Luc and I will be happy to 
follow-up with a note to him.  

 

Kathryn

OASIS 
ebXML Registry TC Chair

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Luc Clement 
[mailto:]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 
2:57 PM
To: James (Jamie) Bryce Clark
Cc: Karl Best; 
; ; Breininger, Kathryn R; Tom 
Bellwood
Subject: Assistance please - FW: ebXML TC review and input of 
the UDDI Spec TC "UDDI as the registry for ebXML 
components"

Jamie,

 

My attempts to deliver mail to 
cyclonecommerce.com addressees are being rejected with: 

  

  
Reason: Delivery not 
authorized

  
The sender is not authorized to send to 
  the destination.

Could you please forward this mail to Dale as 
I'm probably getting caught in some spam filter (I guess  must 
appear to be a suspicious message originator ;-) 
)

 

Thanks,

Luc

 

From: Luc Clement 
Sent: Friday, July 
04, 2003 14:35
To: ''
Cc: 
''; ''; 
''; 'Tom Bellwood'; Karl Best; James (Jamie) Bryce 
Clark
Subject: ebXML TC review and input of the UDDI Spec TC "UDDI as 
the registry for ebXML components"

To:   OASIS ebXML Joint Committee Chair, 
Dale Moberg 

Cc:        

  
OASIS ebXML Collaboration Protocol Profile 
  and Agreement TC Chair, Dale Moberg  
  
OASIS ebXML Implementation, 
  Interoperability and Conformance TC Chair, J Durand  
  
OASIS ebXML Messaging Services TC Chair, 
  Ian Jones  
  
OASIS ebXML Registry TC Chair, Kathryn 
  Breininger  
  
OASIS UDDI Spec TC Co-chair, Tom Bellwood 
   
  
OASIS: Karl Best and Jamie 
Clark

 

References:

[1] UDDI as the registry for ebXML 
components, UDDI Spec TC Technical Note, http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/draft/uddi-spec-tc-tn-uddi-ebxml-20030508.htm  

[2] UDDI Spec TC Process, http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec/doc/process/uddi-spec-tc-process-20021212.htm.

 

Dale,

 

I'm writing to you as Chair of the ebXML JC for the purpose of obtaining 
your and other ebXML TC chair's support for final review and input of the UDDI 
Spec TC's "UDDI as the registry for ebXML 
components" [1] Technical 
Note (TN).  As you may know, the UDDI Spec TC has approved this document as 
a Committee Technical Note in accordance with its TC process which you can find 
in Section 2 of [2].

 

Acting on the UDDI Spec TC's behalf, 
Paul Macias approached the CPPA and Messaging TCs 
in March of this year with a request for review and input on the portions of the 
TN that involve aspects of the CPPA and MS specifications referenced by the 
Technical Note. You agreed as Chair of the CPPA TC to present this TN to your TC 
for review at your TC's 27 March telecon. Paul did not get a response from the 
Messaging TC. Unfortunately, we did not obtain comments back resulting from this 
request, and thus decided to move forward for approval of the TN. I'm pleased to 
note though, that the ebXML RegRep TC has recently provided comment on the TN 
which we will consider during our 8 Jul 
telecon.

 

The TN has now been approved and ready 
to be posted pending finalization of names, URLs and keyspaces referring to 
ebXML components, and consideration of further comments we may receive as part 
of this activity. While the UDDI Spec TC could make such assignments and derive 
these from its namespace, we feel it more appropriate for these to be derived 
from those already defined by the ebXML community. Furthermore, we also think 
that these should be managed by ebXML rather than 
UDDI.

 

We ask your support in your capacity as 
Chair of the ebXML JC in coordinating the necessary activities allowing for the 
following:

 

a. obtain review of the 
TN

b. assign or confirm the 
appropriateness of the current assignments of the 
following:

 

·         
tModel Names (e.g. 
ebxml-org:specifications)

·         
overview document 
URLs used to point to ebXML specifications (e.g. 
http://www.ebxml.org/specs/index.htm)

·         
keyspace used for 
UDDI v3 tModel keys (e.g. uddi:ebxml.org:specifications)

 

Note 1: 
I've provided an excerpt below to demonstrate by way of example what we are 
asking of ebXML TCs. I've put in yellow highlight examples of tModel names, URLs 
and v3 keys we seek input on. 

 

Note 2: 
v1 and v2 format key derivation (by way of UDDI v3's key hashing algorithm) will 
be performed after we finalize the tModel keys to be assigned 

 

If, as a conclusion of your review, you would 
prefer for these names and keyspaces to be assigned by the UDDI TC within its 
own namespace, please let Tom and I know and we will do so.

 

c. identify the timeframe for completion of 
this review

 

We want to finalize and post this TN as soon as possible given its 
approval by the TC, but will gladly delay this allowing for input from ebXML 
TCs.

 

Please let me know your thoughts at the earliest possible convenience. If 
it would help, I'll gladly arrange for a telecon to discuss this with you and 
the other chairs.

 

Thanks in advance for your time and consideration of this 
matter.

Luc 
Clément
Microsoft
Co-chair, OASIS UDDI Spec TC 

 

 

Excerpt from [1]

2.2.3 ebXML 
Specifications Taxonomy tModel

ebXML is a framework that consists of 
several distinct technical specifications, each of which must be represented by 
tModels in a UDDI registry. UDDI tModels are usually tagged with categorizations 
denoting information that facilitates their discovery. That is why before 
defining tModels representing ebXML specifications, we define an ebXML 
Specifications Taxonomy tModel, which is used to categorize these tModels 
(described in the following section).

ebXML Specification Taxonomy tModel:

tModel 
Name:                        
ebxml-org:specifications

tModel Description:               
ebXML Specifications Taxonomy

tModel UDDI Key (V3):           
uddi:ebxml.org:specifications

Derived V1, V2 format Key:   
uuid:xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxx01 (to be 
derived)

Categorization:                     
categorization

Checked:                               
No

 

<tModel 
tModelKey="uuid:xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxx01">

<name>ebxml-org:specifications</name>

<description 
xml:lang="en">ebXML Specifications 
Taxonomy</description>

<overviewDoc>

    
<overviewURL>http://www.ebxml.org/specs/index.htm</overviewURL>

  
</overviewDoc>

  
<categoryBag>

    
<keyedReference

tModelKey="uuid:C1ACF26D-9672-4404-9D70-39B756E62AB4"

keyName="uddi-org:types"

keyValue="categorization" 
/>

    
<keyedReference

tModelKey="uuid:C1ACF26D-9672-4404-9D70-39B756E62AB4"

keyName="uddi-org:types"

keyValue="unchecked" 
/>

  
</categoryBag>

</tModel>

The following values are defined for 
this ebXML Specifications taxonomy. These values are useful for classifying 
ebXML-related tModels and are helpful for others who want to find those 
tModels.

ebXML:CPPA   ebXML Collaboration Protocol Profile and 
Agreement

ebXML:MS       ebXML Message 
Service

ebXML:BPSS   ebXML Business Process Specification 
Schema

Please note that this tModel is a 
categorization system for ebXML framework specifications and does not represent 
ebXML specifications themselves.
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread