Karl wrote:
"We will submit the PDFs of the specs which are available at
http://www.oasis-open.org/specs/index.php, so there's nothing else that
you need to do there. But if your TC has errata then I would appreciate
your contacting me right away (by tomorrow, please)"
Dale> Yes, it has errata.
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-cppa/documents/ebCPP-2_0-Erra
ta.php
"letting me know that
you have errata that you would like
to accompany the submission and when
you will be able to give that to me."
Dale> There was a third errata approved today, and a fourth pending.
Let me know when you need them.
"I also still need to hear from the Messaging and CPPA TCs assuarance
the
that TC has no objection to OASIS submitting the specs to ISO; this
could be links to meeting minutes or a statement from the chair. (I
already have this from Registry TC.)"
Dale>
At today's meeting no objections were offered to OASIS submitting the
specifications to ISO.
However, one question was asked: "Is the Technical Standard (TS) the
same thing as Technical Report?
Some felt that Technical Report status might create a suspicion that the
document had failed to be
approved as a standard. Perhaps you could address this concern.
