Yes, good point.
David.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Weinreb [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:17 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ebxml-msg] Comments on the 1.09 about MessageOrder
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 07:49:32 -0600
From: David Fischer <>
There are other kinds of RM. We are explicitly excluding them in the case of
MessageOrder?
Sorry but I'm not catching on. What you do you mean by "other kinds of RM"?
Are you talking about the scenario of reliable transports, where we
assume that the transport protocol never drops messages and never
duplicates messages, such as using MQSeries in place of HTTP?
If so, I think we're probably on safe grounds assuming that if
a transport protocol does these things, it also makes sure
that messages arrive in order, so I don't see any problem there.
-- Dan
