right, I'm not advocating that the practice be used,
but that it not be precluded, that's all.
Cheers,
Chris
Ralph Berwanger wrote:
> Chris,
> I agree with the technique. I can even make a convincing
> argument for including the capability. I would think that if a message
> originator requested a signed receipt and did not elect to sign the
> original document that the orignator would have a facility to validate
> the signature value returned in the receipt.
> I have a significant collection of legacy data and I am having
> trouble processing this discussion in light of many previous debates, to
> include those with members of the ABA and some elements of the Federal
> Government. My issue boils down to, "I am concerned about the
> perceptions it may spawn." This may not be sufficient enough reason to
> vote against supporting the capability. I can remember early
> discussions regarding dis-embodies signatures and the number of people
> asking, "who would ever do that?"
>
> Ralph
>
>
