{I'm not a member of the CPPA list, so they won't see this :}
According to the XML namespace standard [1],
The prefix xml is by definition bound to the namespace name
http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace.
So the declaration is not required, but it might not be illegal to have
it. I suggest *not* putting it, since it would cause folks to look
twice and wonder if the prefix is being bound to it's non-default
value. And it's easier to point buggy software to the URL that shows
them where they're non-compliant. :)
Also, according to the same spec [2]
Prefixes beginning with the three-letter sequence x, m, l, in
any case combination, are reserved for use by XML and
XML-related specifications.
It's not clear if defining The "xml" prefix to have its official value
is allowed. :)
> We can either replace the contents of
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/xml-lang.xsd with the
> contents of the above file, or we can update our schema and examples to use
> the above URL as the schema location. I think it is simpler to do the
> former.
Again, it would lead to some puzzled looks. I would refer to the
official canonical location.
/r$
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#nsc-NSDeclared
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#xmlReserved
--
Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,
Encryption)
http://www.zolera.com
