Re: [ebxml-msg] Multiple Acknowledgment elements with the same actorURI?

During the face to face, there was discussion of

a) Fixing multi-hop, since there is a perception by vendors that it is broken or not worthy of implementation.

b) Removing multi-hop altogether, and possibly supporting it in the future via our new modular MessageHeader if BPSS/CPPA indicate that we need to provide this functionality.

We should add a note to the applicable requirement pointing to this email so that if (b) is followed, we can make sure the schema/spec restricts the acknowledgment element.

-Matt

On Saturday, October 19, 2002, at 10:33  AM, Christopher B Ferris wrote:

Dave, it isn't a bulk acknowledgment message, this is to accomodate

the potential need to have both a point-to-point and and-to-end

acknowledgment carried in the header of the same message.

I believe that you'll find the rules for this quite well defined and constrained

in the normative prose of the spec.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris

Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture

email: 

phone: +1 508 234 3624

<image.tiff>

Hi all,

Would anybody be able to confirm that it is the intention of the MSS 2.0

specification to allow multiple Acknowlegdment elements with the same

actor URI on a single ebXML message?  (something of a 'bulk

acknowledgment' message).

The schema allows it, the 'interaction' rules allow it, although the

spec wording always refers to Acknowledgment elements in a singular

sense when discussing inclusion in a message.

Thanks and Best Regards,

Dave Elliot

XML Global Technologies

----------------------------------------------------------------

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription

manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>