Is it appropriate to post comments I got for
pull spec? I got some feedbacks, comments, and
questions to the pull messaging spec I have posted
before. If it helps some discussion at F2F, I will
post it soon.
Thanks,
Iwasa
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2005 1:58 AM
Subject: [ebxml-msg] Groups - F2F - Sunnyvale - added
>
> F2F - Sunnyvale - has been added by Mr Ian Jones
>
> Date: Wednesday, 26 January 2005
> Time: All Day
>
> Event Description:
> See Jacques Durand's email of Jan 12 for details
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-msg/email/archives/200501/msg00017.html
>
> Agenda:
> Draft - To be refined
>
> 1. Review of completed reliability section with special attention to the
pull functionality to ensure constancy.
> 2. Review and completion of WS-Security inclusion
> 3. Completion of Payload services
> 4. Complete review of specification identify outstanding work
> Examples
> Bindings
> Appendices
> 5. Requirements for future work and F2F
> 6. BPSS alignment & CPA version control / identification
>
> Minutes:
>
>
> This event is one in a list of recurring events.
> Other event dates in this series:
>
> Thursday, 27 January 2005, All Day
>
> View event details:
>
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ebxml-msg/event.php?event_id=6949
>
> PLEASE NOTE: If the above link does not work for you, your email
> application may be breaking the link into two pieces. You may be able to
> copy and paste the entire link address into the address field of your web
> browser.
>
> Referenced Items
> Date Name Type
> ---- ---- ----
> Fri, 21 Jan 05 MessagingTC011905.html Reference Document
>
