RE: [ebxml-msg] 5.1.3.1 namespace value and new oasis server

No strict requirement in sight on this, as
far as the coming Artifact Standard Identification Scheme OASIS guideline is
concerned.

 

I would opt for RDDL, as we may want to associate
to namespace several resources beyond schema, including the ebMS adjunct doc,
and some referred specifications as well.

An example of what the resolved page could
look like can be seen with WS-ReliableMessaging namespace.

 

Jacques

 

From: Dale Moberg
[mailto:] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:30
PM

To: 

Subject: [ebxml-msg] 5.1.3.1
namespace value and new oasis server

 

5.1.3.1 Artifacts now stored
on docs.oasis-open.org

 

http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schema/msg-header-3_0.xsd

 

Do we want namespace value
to resolve to schema? to rddl?

 

If we want it to dereference
to schema file, then we should change value to be on docs and in the allowed
subdirectory.