← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

[FWD: [ebxml-msg-comment] Public Comment from Yangsun Park, KorBIT

From
David RR Webber \(XML\) <>
Date
2006-07-11T12:15:02+00:00
ID
Thread
[FWD: [ebxml-msg-comment] Public Comment from Yangsun Park, KorBIT
FYI, DW

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
[ebxml-msg-comment] Public Comment
From:

Date: Mon, July 10, 2006 10:54 pm
To:


Comment from:


Name: Yangsun Park
Organization:
KorBIT
Regarding Specification: Public Review Draft 1
ebMS3.0

ebMS 3.0 is seem to get more flexibility to adopt other
existing specifications than ebMS 2.0 specification. I understand
P-Mode is on the context. MEP and MPF give basic view for connect
messaging to business scenario and give solution for some technical
problem. I give you brief comments on new concepts in ebMS 3.0,
pulling, MEP, MPF, P-Mode.

I agree with that
“pulling” is very useful for small businesses to operate
ebMS endpoint especially under condition of dynamic IP addresses. But,
some implementation issues are concerned. The system may not handle the
workload of pulling when messaging with many business partners or
processing lots of messages. (This is out of the scope of this
specification, but I think it’s worth to
consider.)

In the specification, there’s no
mention how to manage the pulling; how the system manages the messages
when messages are already sent to MSH and the pulling request is
delayed with known reason. For using MEP, the agreements between
partners should be described in CPA, but there’s nothing
mentioned on the spec about it. It is recommended to suggest how
business partners can use the MEP or to reference CPA specification at
least.

In case of MPF, it is also needed to consider how
to handle the unexpected situations. If using queue to implement the MPF
system, there can happen problem when several business partners pull
message from same MPF queue.

P-Mode is related to the
implementation issues, but the configuration information seems to
affect the business scenario. It seems to be natural the p-mode is
integrated to the CPA.

The fact sheet is represented
very well, and I think that it will be easier to understand if you
mention the MEPs used in the
specifications.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To
unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional
commands, e-mail: 
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →