RE: [ebxml-msg] Schedule

Iwasa,

 

That's the lean and mean schedule - I don't disagree that it
is the minimum possible within the OASIS process.

 

Now - the only missing piece is the list of outstanding "to dos"
and issues that need to be completed in January to hit that February
date.

 

Otherwise - assuming the spec' editors have time in January to make
the necessary updates and schema changes.

 

It's all just work as always!

 

DW

"The way to be is to do" - Confucius (551-472
B.C.)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re:
[ebxml-msg] Schedule
From: "iwasa"
<>
Date: Wed, December 20, 2006 1:13
am
To: <>,
<>

Here is a draft schedule for
discussion since 
I saw nobody volunteering to draft
it.

--
About one month+ for resolving all issues, comments,
and editorial
updates. It is by the first week of February
2007.

One week for the final TC review, one (to two) week(s) to
incorporate
the comments. The following two voting is on the third
week or 4th week
of February.
   1) making the spec
Committee Draft.
   2) deciding whether there is
substantial change in the new CD or not.
       
OASIS rule requires a second 15days public review, if the
 
      spec has substantial change.

If we need
15days second public review, we will submit it for a second
public
review by the end of February. 
Then the target date for OASIS
submission is April 15, 2007.

If we do not need second public
review, we will submit it to OASIS for
final member voting by March
15, 2007. In this case, we need the
following additional two voting.
Note these are super majority vote.
   3) making the CD to
Committee Specification.
   4) submitting the CS to OASIS
member
voting.

Thoughts?

Thanks,

Iwasa

-----
Original Message ----- 
From: "iwasa"
<>
To:
<>;
<>
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:41
PM
Subject: [ebxml-msg] Schedule

> Ian and TC
members,
> 
> I have been asked when the ebMS3.0 Part I to
be
> standardized.
> I think it is good to agree some rough
schedule, or
> target date for OASIS submission and voting
>
in ebMS TC to explain such question.
> Can we discuss it in the
next teleconference?
> 
> I think if somebody can draft a
proposed plan
> by the next meeting, that would help the
discussion.
> If no one voluntieer for it, I will.
>

> Thanks,
> 
> Iwasa
> 
> PS. I don't
think we have to commit the schedule, but 
> we need to show our
plan.