Anil, we recommend possible experts on specific standards with some frequency; sometimes as liaisons (in which OASIS retains a role), sometimes as contractors (in which generally we don't). Regards J
Sent from my mobile
On May 13, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Anil Saldhana <> wrote:
> Hal,
> do you know if there is any precedence to hiring standards experts on contractual basis via Oasis?
>
> I would presume we just have to request someone from the SAML TC who is in Europe to be the liaison.
>
> Regards,
> Anil
>
> On 05/13/2011 09:48 AM, Peter F Brown wrote:
>> OK,
>>
>> So the main question is: Who feels that they could provide authoritative
>> input and advice to the STORK 2 project, particularly with regard to SAML?
>>
>> If we can get a name, I’d be happy to provide the liaison with the proposed
>> STORK 2 consortium to get them on board. But we have to be quick, as the
>> deadline is looming….
>>
>>
>>
>> And, yes, there is contractual money involved
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Laurent M. Liscia [mailto:]
>> Sent: Friday, 13 May, 2011 07:25
>> To:
>> Cc: 'Anil Saldhana'; ;
>> Subject: Re: FW: STORK 2
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you Peter (what are you doing up so early?),
>> For once I can speak for OASIS since this is a bit of an admin issue.
>> OASIS does not possess IPR per se - our members do; that's why, even when we
>> are members of another org, we contribute no IPR. But we do have people
>> representing us in "consortia" or large-scale projects, such as STORK. I
>> think SIENA is exactly like STORK and we have Gershon Janssen and John
>> Borras speaking on behalf of OASIS: they provide advice and act as liaisons.
>> That is completely feasible. If Anil or Hal care to do the same ...
>> Finally it seems to me that the end-game is to get these guys to standardize
>> their output in OASIS as per the PEPPOL example.
>>
>>
>> On 5/12/2011 6:00 PM, Peter F Brown wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm,
>>
>> Is there anything we can do with this?
>>
>> Would SAML be interested and/or able to take this up? And how would we
>> handle the legal/contractual issues of ‘OASIS’ as an entity joining such a
>> consortium…
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Alicia Garcia Medina [mailto:]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 11 May, 2011 14:54
>> To: Alicia Garcia Medina;
>> Cc: Peter Kustor ; Alberto Crespo Garcia; Ana Maria Piñuela Marcos;
>> ; Riedl Reinhard; ;
>> Reinhard Posch
>> Subject: RE: STORK 2
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Peter,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have communicated to the core team your interest and some question arises
>> since in STORK we do not create standards but support standardisation and we
>> would need technical advice on WP4´s SAML profile.
>>
>>
>>
>> Could you please indicate to me who would participate as legal entity? Is
>> OASIS a legal entity or will it be a company?
>>
>>
>>
>> I copy in this message WP4 leader (Miguel) and WP6 co-leaders (Reinhard and
>> Neil) so you all can check if this fits in STORK 2.0.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Alicia.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Peter F Brown [mailto:]
>> Sent: martes, 10 de mayo de 2011 19:57
>> To: 'Reinhard Posch'
>> Cc: 'Peter Kustor '; Alicia Garcia Medina
>> Subject: RE: STORK 2
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Reinhard, thanks for the prompt reply.
>>
>>
>>
>> Indeed, the project is about pilots and with an extended scope as you say,
>> with health sector and banking.
>>
>> Our concern, as OASIS, would be to see what role we can play in facilitating
>> the development of new – or greater take-up of existing – standards in this
>> project. As you know, we have a new TC set up to pursue work for PEPPOL (the
>> OASIS BDX TC) that will hopefully provide a durable standard beyond the
>> lifetime of that large-scale pilot – so the main question is: has STORK
>> identified a “gap in the market” of IDM standards that needs to be filled?
>> If the answer is yes, then our participation could be helpful; if no, then
>> it would be a different issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Reinhard Posch [mailto:]
>> Sent: Monday, 09 May, 2011 21:34
>> To:
>> Cc: Peter Kustor
>> Subject: Re: STORK 2
>>
>>
>>
>> .. indeed June 1st is very near. On the question of technicality of joining
>> this late
>>
>> Alicia Garcia Medina<> from ATOS could give
>>
>> you more details.
>>
>> Then it would come to what is OASIS bringing to the pilots. It is pilots -
>> having
>>
>> said this I mean that it is about interoperability of existing eID of Member
>> States
>>
>> also with flavors like using them in the private sector like banks and heath
>> care.
>>
>>
>>
>> Was nice to hear from you
>>
>> Reinhard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 10.05.2011 um 01:40 schrieb Peter F Brown:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was talking last week in Brussels with Jean-Francois Junger at the
>> European Commission and he mentioned the current CfP for the next phase of
>> STORK.
>>
>>
>>
>> He suggested that OASIS, as a standards organisation active in IDM, ought to
>> consider joining the proposed new consortium, and help with the delivery of
>> standards to be used in the STORK.
>>
>>
>>
>> Any thoughts on the matter? Is it realistic, given that the deadline is 1st
>> June?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards from (not so sunny) Los Angeles
>>
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>>
>> Peter F Brown
>>
>> Independent Consultant
>>
>> <image001.png>
>>
>> Transforming our Relationships with Information Technologies
>>
>> <x-msg://101/www.peterfbrown.com> www.peterfbrown.com
>>
>> P.O. Box 49719, Los Angeles, CA 90049, USA
>>
>> Tel: +1.310.694.227
