I did not have a chance to review EML before it went to committee vote, so
John asked to make comments during the public consultation.
I have a few immediate comments, which I attach. Two relate to the schemas,
and so are probably mainly for David, the others to the documentation, which
I feel needs some further updating. I have not done a detailed review,
partly because this would take several days and partly because the general
comments serve to cover most areas.
I have also been thinking about the future of EML, and will send a separate
email.
Regards
Paul Spencer
Director
Boynings Consulting Ltd
http://boynings.co.uk
