← Prev in month ← Prev in thread

RE: [election-services] Much better news on 120 v 230 / 330

From
John Borras <>
Date
2009-04-02T10:04:47+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [election-services] Much better news on 120 v 230 / 330
David

 

Just to be clear what you are proposing:

 

On the 120-330 Compare sheet all the entries in orange would be
added to the 330 and then we delete the 120?

 

We keep the 230 but add a Source item?

 

What happens to the 130?

 

 

John

 

From: David RR Webber (XML)
[mailto:] 

Sent: 31 March 2009 20:51

To: eml 

Subject: [election-services] Much better news on 120 v 230 / 330

 

Team,

 

OK - went back and reviewed everything and significantly improved
the dictionary compare XSLT processing.

 

Adding in the 230 definately completes the other pieces of the
puzzle.

 

Attached Excel spreadsheet.

 

I believe this shows we are very close - most items do indeed
match as Paul thought.  

 

Reviewing the 120 to combined worksheet - following
suggestions:

 

- 178 - we add a Source node to 230 and 330 - that tracks
original source of content.

 

I am seeing that the remaining items in the 120 relate to physical
transfer of content - and hence are more of a "result report" that a
batch process would produce - rather than something we should perscribe into
the standard.  Typically this would all be external to the EML - a results
report - that a SQL or similar process e.g a DIFF) would produce.

 

Thoughts everyone?

 

Thanks, DW
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread