RE: [election-services] Election Systems and Standards Paper - NISTworkshop

Mary,

To be clear - these are draft materials ONLY - not formally approved.

A committee is permitted to distinguish work as such - and obviously presenters need to make clear this is not formally approved work - just work produced by members of the TC.

For example this email itself is not formally approved by the TC - but I'm allowed to post it here - and the archives will show it as eminating from the OASIS TC as the source.

We just need to be clear on when something is formally approved work product - and the document repository has that clearly distinguished.

Similarly if Laurent submits a presentation - that has not been formally approved by a TC either.

Thanks, DW

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [election-services] Election Systems and Standards Paper -

NIST  workshop

From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <>

Date: Wed, August 26, 2009 1:44 pm

To: Mary McRae <>

Cc: "David RR Webber (XML)" <>, eml

<>,  CAM OASIS TC

<>, Laurent Liscia

<>

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Mary McRae<> wrote:

> If this is to be submitted on behalf of the TC and identified as work of the

> TC, please make sure that the TC has voted to approve the document as such.

Yes, this concerns me for any submission purporting to come from the

TC.  I don't think any of us have had adequate time to look either of

the submissions over. best, Joe

-- 

Joseph Lorenzo Hall

ACCURATE Postdoctoral Research Associate

UC Berkeley School of Information

Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy

http://josephhall.org/