RE: [election-services] Election Systems and Standards Paper - NISTworkshop

Mary,

OK got it.  Did not spot that till now.

Using a template out of context - never good - and I'm supposed to know templates and context!  ; -)

I've refactored the attached frontis page and added a disclaimer at the bottom page - does this look good now? 

Thanks, DW

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [election-services] Election Systems and Standards Paper -

NIST workshop

From: Mary McRae <>

Date: Wed, August 26, 2009 2:47 pm

To: "David RR Webber (XML)" <>

Cc: "Joseph Lorenzo Hall" <>, "eml"

<>, "Laurent Liscia"

<>

Hi David,

  If this is a personal submission it shouldn't be using the OASIS white paper template. 

Regards,

 

Mary 

 

On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, David RR Webber (XML) wrote:

Mary,

Understood.  I'm submitting this from myself only.  Obviously as Joe noted - there is not time here for anything else.  Unfortunately NIST only gave barely 4 weeks notice on this.

I was just looking to provide opportunity for the team to provide suggestions, improvements, comments, omissions, etc for me here.

Thanks, DW

  
 -------- Original Message --------
 Subject: Re: [election-services] Election Systems and Standards Paper -
 NIST workshop
 From: Mary McRae <>
 Date: Wed, August 26, 2009 2:14 pm
 To: David RR Webber (XML) <>
 Cc: "Joseph Lorenzo Hall" <>, "eml"
 <>, "Laurent Liscia"
 <>
 
 Hi David,

  Actually, the email archive will show you as the sender and not the TC; the concern is that if you are actually giving a presentation on behalf of the TC or submitting a white paper on behalf of the TC, it must first be approved by the TC and must be properly attributed.

Regards,

 

Mary 

 

On Aug 26, 2009, at 1:56 PM, David RR Webber (XML) wrote:

Mary,

To be clear - these are draft materials ONLY - not formally approved.

A committee is permitted to distinguish work as such - and obviously presenters need to make clear this is not formally approved work - just work produced by members of the TC.

For example this email itself is not formally approved by the TC - but I'm allowed to post it here - and the archives will show it as eminating from the OASIS TC as the source.

We just need to be clear on when something is formally approved work product - and the document repository has that clearly distinguished.

Similarly if Laurent submits a presentation - that has not been formally approved by a TC either.

Thanks, DW

  
 -------- Original Message --------
 Subject: Re: [election-services] Election Systems and Standards Paper -
 NIST workshop
 From: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <>
 Date: Wed, August 26, 2009 1:44 pm
 To: Mary McRae <>
 Cc: "David RR Webber (XML)" <>, eml
 <>, CAM OASIS TC
 <>, Laurent Liscia
 <>
 
 On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Mary McRae<> wrote:
 > If this is to be submitted on behalf of the TC and identified as work of the
 > TC, please make sure that the TC has voted to approve the document as such.
 
 Yes, this concerns me for any submission purporting to come from the
 TC. I don't think any of us have had adequate time to look either of
 the submissions over. best, Joe
 
 -- 
 Joseph Lorenzo Hall
 ACCURATE Postdoctoral Research Associate
 UC Berkeley School of Information
 Princeton Center for Information Technology Policy
 http://josephhall.org/
 
 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 

 
 

Election Systems and Standards.doc