RE: [election-services] EML60Analysis

Hi,

The attached document annotates the table in John's Dec. 9, 2009, 
posting with more detailed suggestions on how we might proceed with 
schema modifications.  The net result of this second review is that of 
the 47 points of interest listed in the table, I'm reasonably confident 
in recommending changes in 14 cases and recommending no changes in 
another 19 cases.  In the remaining 14 cases, changes might be 
worthwhile, but more discussion should take place.  All suggestions are 
with regard to the near-term.  In some cases, I suggest we make a simple 
change now and defer the possibility of more involved changes to the 
next release.  I hope this moves the ball forward.

Happy New Year to all,
Rich