Request added wording for Adresses

Hi Gary,

I'm assuming that this is for the CAP-IPAWS Profile, so I am copying
that list with this message, and we can discuss it at tomorrow's
meeting.

Cheers,
Rex

At 6:44 AM -0400 6/1/09, Gary Ham wrote:
>This comment was passed to me from IBM's the design team at EADIS
>team working on the new DM-OPEN interfaces. They would like to add
>the following language:
>
>"(4) MAY also be used when <scope> value is "Public" to mean that
>the contained addresses are required destinations, but that
>retransmission to other addresses is allowed as necessary."
>
>Note that this change requires no change in schema and will not
>affect other implementations of CAP, but will allow CAP messages to
>be retransmitted when certain known addresses are required, but
>there may be an unknown set of others who would also benefit from
>the message.  This would also make wrapping a CAP Message in a
>Distribution Element for retransmission a bit easier.
>
>R/S
>
>
>Gary A. Ham
><http://grandpaham.com>http://grandpaham.com
>703-899-6241
>Grandpa can do IT!
>

--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670