Discussion topics for CAP-AU Profile meeting

Hi Elysa, Chet, Everyone,
In my last previous post on this topic I suggested we could use the
OASIS URN if a urn or  pseudo-urn  was needed for the Australian
Profile of CAP. This was prior to learning that this was based on
the Canadian CAP Profile. I provided links to the IETF RFC for an
URN Namespace for OASIS. Subsequently it came to my attention that
we might want to also review the current OASIS Naming Directives
To wit: OASIS says in the Naming Directives of 2010, and see the
references for W3C findings:
Non-information resources using identifiers associated with
XML namespaces may be based upon any HTTP scheme URI XML namespace
declared by the TC ( i.e. , identifiers for named properties,
functions, dialects, faults, actions, or  any
named message types ).
Viz., identifiers for any constructs in a an abstract  space
of  names  bounded only by the initial components in string
identifiers
http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives.html#nonInformationResources
http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives.html#note-informationResource
Note: As a TC which has used URNs, we can continue to use them
but are not required to use them, and they continue to be a
mechanism we have available to us. To be honest, so many uses
for identifiers have cropped up over the ten years since the
oasis urn namespace was established that we could get really
bogged down in this discussion, so I hope we can arrive at a
conclusion that neither requires delays nor unduly limits future
uses.
Cheers,
Rex
On 11/28/11 7:05 AM, Elysa Jones wrote:
Hi Chet,

Thank you for making the time for a call
with the CAP-Profiles SC.  The topics we would like to discuss
today are on the attached meeting agenda.  “See” you on the
call at 4ET.

Kind regards,
Elysa

---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
For additional commands, e-mail: