RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

Sounds good to me

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Orville Lee Tincher
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 3:52 AM
To: 'McGarry, Donald P.'; 'Freeman, Solomon (HHS/ASPR/OPEO)'; 'Leinenweber, Lewis'; 'Dwarkanath, Sukumar'; 'Grapes, Timothy'; 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

Ok – it looks like we will not find a time where everybody can be on.  Let’s just got for Tuesdays at 4:00 EDT as a general rule and get Elysa to give us a weekly bridge to use….just make it when you can so we can get this completed…

 

Thanks,

Lee

 

Orville Tincher I VP EvoTec division I SE Solutions I  

 I 540-539-4759 phone I 703-251-4440 fax I 

11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1300 I Reston, VA 20190 I  www.sesolutions.com I

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of McGarry, Donald P.
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:21 PM
To: Freeman, Solomon (HHS/ASPR/OPEO); Leinenweber, Lewis; Tincher, Orville; Dwarkanath, Sukumar; Grapes, Timothy; 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

Tues 10/4 is no good for me

 

-Don



703-595-9375

 

From: Freeman, Solomon (HHS/ASPR/OPEO) [mailto:] 
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 3:01 PM
To: Leinenweber, Lewis; Tincher, Orville; Dwarkanath, Sukumar; McGarry, Donald P.; Grapes, Timothy; 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

Anytime Tuesday is fine with me.

 

Thanks,

 

Solomon

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Leinenweber, Lewis
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 2:31 PM
To: Tincher, Orville; Dwarkanath, Sukumar; McGarry, Donald P.; Grapes, Timothy; 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

EM-TC meets at 12 Noon every other Tues (i.e, this week, 11 Oct, 25 Oct, etc). Not currently shown on Kavi, however, I believe the cycle continues as a regular meeting.

 

Regards,

Lew Leinenweber

SE Solutions, Inc.

301.351.4485

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Orville Lee Tincher
Sent: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 5:40 PM
To: 'Dwarkanath, Sukumar'; 'McGarry, Donald P.'; Grapes, Timothy; 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

Ok with me….

 

Anyone else?

 

Orville Tincher I VP EvoTec division I SE Solutions I  

 I 540-539-4759 phone I 703-251-4440 fax I 

11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1300 I Reston, VA 20190 I  www.sesolutions.com I

 

From: Dwarkanath, Sukumar [mailto:] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 5:41 PM
To: Orville Lee Tincher; McGarry, Donald P.; Grapes, Timothy; 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

I would prefer later in the week – Mondays are pretty bad. 

 

How about Tuesdays at noon?

 

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Orville Lee Tincher
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 5:02 PM
To: 'McGarry, Donald P.'; 'Grapes, Timothy'; 
Cc: 
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

This time works for me….if there are no objections I’ll set up the calendar request.

 

Tim – What conference line should I use now? The new one or the old?

 

Thanks,

Lee

Orville Tincher I VP EvoTec division I SE Solutions I  

 I 540-539-4759 phone I 703-251-4440 fax I 

11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1300 I Reston, VA 20190 I  www.sesolutions.com I

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of McGarry, Donald P.
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Grapes, Timothy; 
Cc: 
Subject: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

How about Monday 10/3 after 3PM EST?

 

-Don



703-595-9375

 

From:  [mailto:] On Behalf Of Grapes, Timothy
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:06 PM
To: 
Cc: 
Subject: [emergency-have] Discuss HAVE 2.0

 

All,

 

This is a courtesy note promised to your chair, Lee Tincher a while back.  As you know, the HAVE 2.0 subcommittee agreed to postpone further meetings as available resources focuses on the common areas required for re-use by HAVE 2.0, as well as SitReps and DE 2.0 (Common Types, gmlSimpleFeatures, and CIQ  ), and also getting EDXL-SitReps Committee Draft into the EM-TC.  

 

The common areas are by and large completed, though tweaks will be ongoing.  SitReps CD was submitted today for review by the EM-TC, but I expect we may need to spend some time addressing feedback or issues, and then getting the draft into its first public comment.  

 

That said, I suggest the committee re-convene to determine timing and process to re-engage this effort.  I expect that some competition for resources will occur between HAVE 2.0 and the EDXL-TEP subcommittee which is now in process.   Fortunately, your co-chair Don McGarry is also on TEP, and it may be advisable at certain junctures to coordinate activities so that we don’t step on one another or compete for resources at critical junctures.

Best,
    Tim

Tim Grapes

SE Solutions, Inc.

(703) 304-4829