EM-TC meets at 12 Noon every
other Tues (i.e, this week, 11 Oct, 25 Oct, etc). Not currently shown on Kavi, however,
I believe the cycle continues as a regular meeting.
Regards,
Lew Leinenweber
SE Solutions, Inc.
301.351.4485
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Orville Lee
Tincher
Sent: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 5:40 PM
To: 'Dwarkanath, Sukumar'; 'McGarry, Donald P.'; Grapes, Timothy;
Cc:
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0
Ok with me….
Anyone else?
Orville Tincher I VP EvoTec division I SE
Solutions I
I 540-539-4759
phone I
703-251-4440 fax I
11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1300 I
Reston, VA 20190 I www.sesolutions.com I
From: Dwarkanath, Sukumar
[mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 5:41 PM
To: Orville Lee Tincher; McGarry, Donald P.; Grapes, Timothy;
Cc:
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0
I would prefer later in the week
– Mondays are pretty bad.
How about Tuesdays at noon?
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Orville Lee
Tincher
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 5:02 PM
To: 'McGarry, Donald P.'; 'Grapes, Timothy';
Cc:
Subject: RE: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0
This time works for me….if there
are no objections I’ll set up the calendar request.
Tim – What conference line
should I use now? The new one or the old?
Thanks,
Lee
Orville Tincher I VP EvoTec division I SE
Solutions I
I 540-539-4759
phone I
703-251-4440 fax I
11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1300 I
Reston, VA 20190 I www.sesolutions.com I
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of McGarry,
Donald P.
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 5:32 PM
To: Grapes, Timothy;
Cc:
Subject: [emergency-have] RE: Discuss HAVE 2.0
How about Monday 10/3 after 3PM
EST?
-Don
703-595-9375
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Grapes, Timothy
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:06 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject: [emergency-have] Discuss HAVE 2.0
All,
This is a courtesy note promised to your chair, Lee Tincher
a while back. As you know, the HAVE 2.0 subcommittee agreed to postpone
further meetings as available resources focuses on the common areas required
for re-use by HAVE 2.0, as well as SitReps and DE 2.0 (Common Types,
gmlSimpleFeatures, and CIQ ), and also getting EDXL-SitReps Committee
Draft into the EM-TC.
The common areas are by and large completed, though tweaks
will be ongoing. SitReps CD was submitted today for review by the EM-TC,
but I expect we may need to spend some time addressing feedback or issues, and
then getting the draft into its first public comment.
That said, I suggest the committee re-convene to determine
timing and process to re-engage this effort. I expect that some
competition for resources will occur between HAVE 2.0 and the EDXL-TEP
subcommittee which is now in process. Fortunately, your co-chair
Don McGarry is also on TEP, and it may be advisable at certain junctures to
coordinate activities so that we don’t step on one another or compete for
resources at critical junctures.
Best,
Tim
Tim Grapes
SE Solutions, Inc.
(703) 304-4829
