← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Groups - v0.6 (HAVE 2.0) uploaded

From
Darrell O'Donnell <>
Date
2012-06-15T11:03:24+00:00
ID
Thread
Groups - v0.6 (HAVE 2.0) uploaded
Submitter's message

        This document is more coherent than my last efforts. There is still a lot of work to be done, but it provides what I believe is a better model for Reporting Periods, Services (included bed capacity by service), Resources, and Capacities. The concepts of Services, Resources, and Capacities were all over the place in HAVE 1.0 and in earlier versions of 2.0 (2.1 by temporary convention).

There are a lot of annotations with "QUESTION"  and "TO DO" in the them. My intent there is to get the group thinking about particular issues that need to be either resolved (QUESTION) or that are "just work" (TO DO).

I have attempted to keep the resulting data simple. One area that should help is the Reporting Period, where the CurrentServices and FutureServices have explicit time windows. I am not sure if this adds more complexity but I can't see any consistent way around making sure we know what time we are talking about otherwise. 

        

-- Darrell O'Donnell
        
    

    
        Document Name: v0.6 (HAVE 2.0)

        
        Description

        This document is more coherent than my last efforts. There is still a lot

of work to be done, but it provides what I believe is a better model for

Reporting Periods, Services (included bed capacity by service), Resources,

and Capacities. The concepts of Services, Resources, and Capacities were

all over the place in HAVE 1.0 and in earlier versions of 2.0 (2.1 by

temporary convention).

There are a lot of annotations with "QUESTION"  and "TO DO" in the them. My

intent there is to get the group thinking about particular issues that need

to be either resolved (QUESTION) or that are "just work" (TO DO).

I have attempted to keep the resulting data simple. One area that should

help is the Reporting Period, where the CurrentServices and FutureServices

have explicit time windows. I am not sure if this adds more complexity but

I can't see any consistent way around making sure we know what time we are

talking about otherwise.        

        Download Latest Revision

        Public Download Link
        
        Submitter: Darrell O'Donnell

                Group: EM HAVE SC

        Folder: Standards

        Date submitted: 2012-06-15 04:03:19
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →