Title: Infrastructure Meeting Today.
Same policy as the OGC. I do not see any issues.
Cheers
Carl
----- Original Message -----
From:
McGarry, Donald
P.
To: David E. Ellis ;
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 8:10
AM
Subject: RE: [emergency-if]
Infrastructure Meeting Today.
FYI…If
you are referring to my videos being non-compliant with the OASIS IPR due to
the copyright notice on the whiteboard, you are incorrect dur to Section 5.2
Subsection 1 of the OASIS IPR:
To
the extent that a Contributor holds a copyright interest in its Contribution,
such Contributor grants to OASIS a perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive,
royalty-free, worldwide copyright license, with the right to directly and
indirectly sublicense, to copy, publish, and distribute the Contribution in
any way, and to prepare derivative works that are based on or incorporate all
or part of the Contribution solely for the purpose of developing and promoting
the OASIS Deliverable and enabling (subject to the rights of the owners of any
Essential Claims) the implementation of the same by Licensees or
Beneficiaries.
We
have granted OASIS said copyright license by our signature of the IPR. I
checked with our legal department before posting.
-Don
Office:
315-838-2669
Cell:
703-595-9375
From: David E. Ellis
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 9:57
AM
To:
Subject:
[emergency-if] Infrastructure Meeting Today.
All;
I would like to use
today’s meeting to prepare for the Face-to-Face next week. I have attached a word document
for consideration about the structure and use of EDXL-DE
element with the Routing infrastructure. This is
really important because even after literally years of discussion, the DE is
often thought of as Metadata for contents in a data storage
repository or for display on COP like UCORE. I would like to use the attached
to explain.
The first thing which
became obvious was this needed to have significant flexibility. There
were needs for:
1.
Unique message
identity
2.
Distribution infrastructure
3.
Delivery
Status
4.
Policy based adjudication
between Social Structures
5.
Capability to hand off to
other distribution systems and preserve Policy based
routing.
6.
Subscription for Messages
based on target Area.
7.
Ability to deliver Multiple
Content Objects.
8.
Ability to deliver both XML
and Non-XML content.
9.
Ability to describe Content
Objects to determine specific application consumption
needs
10.
Ability to extract key element needed for
deliver decision from encrypted
content.
11.
Ability to provide
granular Willingness
information at multiple levels. (content, content object and entire
message)
I would also like to
discuss the draft Hans has provided Also. It can give us some topics to
consider.
Jeff, I have a Lab
inspection which will
run right up to the start of the call. Please take attendance and have
the subcommittee
discuss your minutes. Please do not submit material which is not covered by
the EM committee IPR rules.
<<...>>
David E.
Ellis
(505)
844-6697
