← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Groups - DRAFT-12-06-11-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.doc uploaded

From
Jeff Waters
Date
2011-12-06T18:32:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Groups - DRAFT-12-06-11-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.doc uploaded
Submitter's message
Please review these December 6, 2011 minutes of the Infrastructure Framework Subcommittee for approval at our next meeting, subject to any specified  changes. Thanks

--
Jeff Waters
Document Name :  DRAFT-12-06-11-Minutes-IF-Subcommittee.doc
Description
At the December 6, 2011 meeting of the Infrastructure Framework  Subcommittee, the members discussed the following topics:

 1.  TOPIC: Is the DE 2.0 draft close to public review?
(Answer: Yes. Chet  advised that the public review should go out by Thursday.  This is very  good news and thanks so much to Chet and the OASIS staff for this excellent  support and progress.)

 2.  TOPIC: How best should we handle aggregating, discussing and making  changes to the working draft?
(Answer: The previous process was to note  the issues, discuss them and resolve on the telecons, then have one master  editor merge the changes and generate the new working draft. It is assumed  that we can't make changes to the version accessible to the public as part  of the public review. It would be ideal if we had a document management  system that allowed multiple people to collaborate on one draft, but that  isn't an option at the moment.)

 3.  TOPIC: How best should we use JIRA to track issues in support of the  public review? (Answer: Chet attended today's meeting and began a  walk-through of best practices for how to use JIRA to track issues. Chet  will arrange a webex for a more detailed walk-through. For example, the  OASIS Energy Interoperation TC was cited  (http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aopenissues-panel)  as an example of tying issues to specification components and enabling  effective filtering by practices such as (a) creating JIRA components for  each major part of a specification (e.g. schema, specification, note,  etc.); (b) using the Environment field to specify the name of the person  who originally made the comment; and (c) specifying the working draft  version impacted.)
References:

 (1) DE 2.0 CSD Request Tracker:
http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN-759
 (2) DE 2.0 Public Review Request Tracker:  http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TCADMIN-775
 (3) Example use of JIRA, Best Practices:  http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/ENERGYINTEROP?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aopenissues-panel
Download Latest Revision
Public Download Link
Submitter : Jeff Waters
Group : EM Infrastructure Framework SC
Folder : Resources
Date submitted : 2011-12-06 10:32:17
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →