← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Fwd: Re: [emergency-msg] RE: [emergency] EM-Msg: MeetingTomorrow_Veterans Day? Fwd: Re: CAP comments summary

From
Rex Brooks <>
Date
2008-11-11T01:30:52+00:00
ID
a0624080ec53e90abd891@[192.168.15.2]
Thread
Fwd: Re: [emergency-msg] RE: [emergency] EM-Msg: MeetingTomorrow_Veterans Day? Fwd: Re: CAP comments summary
>Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 20:02:27 -0500
>From: Jacob Westfall <>
>To: Rex Brooks <>
>Cc: , 
>, 
>
>Subject: Re: [emergency-msg] RE: [emergency] EM-Msg: Meeting 
>Tomorrow_Veterans Day? Fwd: Re: CAP comments summary
>Organization: JPW
>X-Nonspam: Statistical 56%
>
>Hi,
>	Re the concerns with <xs:any>.  Looking over the concerns 1-3 
>I think they are more in regards to tags being added to the CAP 
>namespace directly, rather than using namespace extensions.  So 
>proper use of ##other or even specifying allowed namespaces like GML 
>or geo-oasis could resolve these.  Also restricting the use of 
>extensions to the area and resource blocks would help.  The example 
>was mentioned of sensor data, so allowing SensorML as an extension 
>to the resource block, instead of dumping data into a description 
>field, or hundreds of parameters.
>
>--
>
>--


-- 
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-898-0670
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →