Re: [emergency-msg] CAP 1.2 changes
> start sliding down any slippery slopes. That's why I suggested > leaving EDXL-DE out. Once we start debating what to say about what we > plan to do when, there's no easy way to decide where to stop. But > that's what the list is good for now. I don't care either way. Having something about EDXL could be good for user education and promoting other EM-TC specs. But if it could cause problems working out what to say, then best to leave it out. -- --