← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →

Groups - DRAFT-EDXL-RIM-SC-MtgNotes-01-12-2012.doc uploaded

From
Jeff Waters
Date
2012-01-26T19:38:00+00:00
ID
Thread
Groups - DRAFT-EDXL-RIM-SC-MtgNotes-01-12-2012.doc uploaded
Submitter's message
Please review these minutes from the January 12th, 2012 meeting of the Emergency Management Reference Information Model subcommittee for approval at our next meeting, subject to any specified changes. Thanks.

--
Jeff Waters
Document Name :  DRAFT-EDXL-RIM-SC-MtgNotes-01-12-2012.doc
Description
At the January 12th, 2012 meeting of the Reference Information Model  Subcommittee, the members discussed the following topics:

 1. TOPIC:  What were our major RIM accomplishments in 2011 and what  challenges remain? (Answer: The major RIM accomplishments included  developing the process for submitting common components and profiles and  facilitating the OASIS approval of three common components, the Common  Types, the CIQ Profile and the GML Simple Features Profile. A primary  challenge is the further development of the EDXL Information Model; however  Rex has made significant progress in developing both the architecture model  and the ontology of terms. )

 2. TOPIC:  Is a reference implementation of the EDXL Information Model  along with an Emergency Services pattern possible? (Answer: Yes. Mitre has  created an impressive dashboard capability and Rex is working an Emergency  Services pattern in NCOIC.  These capabilities and patterns could be the  reference implementation that allows users and developers to get a  practical and useful representation of the benefits of standardized  emergency terms and services. )

 3. TOPIC:  What levels of modeling should our RIM work address? (Answer:  Regarding high level modeling versus implementation, the consensus is that  the the focus is establishing a formal foundation for a data model and  protocols for interaction between components.  This serves the purposes of  consistency, organization, information, and guidance.  This would include  taking existing specifications and re-analyzing them to convert into the  formal model and check consistency of the specification with the formal  model.  As needed, we deliver common components. In the long run, we might  generate a skeleton of a specification for a new specification, perhaps  similar to the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) subschema  generation tool. There is also the potential for translation of current XML  into more expressive formats to enable the benefits for those who need  them.)
Download Latest Revision
Public Download Link
Submitter : Jeff Waters
Group : EM Reference Information Model SC
Folder : Meeting Notes
Date submitted : 2012-01-26 11:37:36
← Prev in month ← Prev in thread
Next in thread → Next in month →