Fwd: Re: [emergency-adopt-docs] Groups - Example Practices: CAP Feeds uploaded

-------- Original Message --------
      
        
          

            Subject:
            
            Re: [emergency-adopt-docs] Groups - Example Practices:
              CAP Feeds uploaded
          

          

            Date: 
            Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:04:32 -0700
          

          

            From: 
            Anthony Mancuso <>
          

          

            To: 
            Christian, Eliot <>
          

          

            CC: 
            Rex Brooks <>, Jacob Westfall
              <>, Cammy O <>,
              ""
              <>, Eliot Christian
              <>
          

        
      
      

      

      
Hi all,
        

        

        
Attached are the latest version of both the CAP
          Feed and CAP Elements Example Practices docs. We are hoping
          for closure on both at the next Collateral & Documentation
          SC meeting, Tuesday, April 2nd. Thanks for all the good
          feedback.

        

        

        
There are a few outstanding comments, which some
          may wish to respond to.

        

        

        
Tony

        

        

        
I'm also posting these to the OASIS Collateral and
          Documentation Drafts folder.

      

      

        

        
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:43 AM,
          Christian, Eliot <> wrote:

          
            

              
Hi Rex,

                

              

              Here attached are some comments on the Elements document.
              In this my comments and suggested edits are in Track
              Changes made after first accepting all prior changes to
              the document.

              

                In light of the extensive revisions to the Feeds
                document proposed by Jake, I think I had best to wait on
                commenting on that one until you have a new version. As
                you might expect from my previous input, I disagree with
                some of the points Jake makes but I agree with the
                others.

                    

                  

              
                  

                    Eliot

                  

                
              

                

                  

                    
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at
                      10:59 AM, Rex Brooks <>
                      wrote:

                      Hi Everyone,

                        

                        I had been holding off on asking for feedback
                        from Art Botterell and Eliot Christian and the
                        EM TC until we pushed these two Committee Note
                        Drafts up to the EM Adoption TC level from the
                        Collateral and Documents SC, but it looks to me
                        now that it would be wiser to get their feedback
                        now rather than later because it is now fairly
                        clear that even if we pushed it up to the TC, it
                        would get sent back to us.

                        

                        So Art, Eliot, please give us the benefit of
                        your thoughts in regard to these two documents.
                        Please keep them separate, so we can push
                        whichever gets ready to advancement first up to
                        the TC level.

                        

                        Note: the advice/guidance/resolution of the
                        value <unknown> for Urgency, Severity and
                        Certainty is being worked in the RIM SC of the
                        EM TC. It was hoped that the language for
                        advising the implementer-users about what
                        <unknown> means and doesn't mean would be
                        finalized in time for inclusion in these work
                        products by the time that the TC is ready for a
                        public review. That is still the goal, though
                        now we will want to shoot for the time that the
                        first of these two documents is ready to be
                        pushed up to the TC level. However, since the
                        RIM SC will be adding discussion of some issues
                        coming out the EDXL-Tracking Emergency Patients
                        v1.0 effort, it seems wiser to just proceed by
                        the seat of our collective pants rather than
                        chase milestone dates.

                        

                        

                        Example Practices: CAP Feeds:

                        https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-adopt-docs/download.php/48413/cap-feed-v1.0-wd13.doc

                        

                        Example Practices: CAP Elements

                        https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency-adopt-docs/download.php/48410/cap-elements--v1.0-wd03.doc

                        

                        Cheers,

                        Rex

                        

                        

                        On 3/6/2013 7:09 AM, Jacob Westfall wrote:

                        
                          
                            question: Were you planning to send comments
                            on the companion doc: "Example

                            Feeds: CAP Elements? We were about to move
                            these docs to the TC level, so I

                            want to gather any new comments as soon as
                            possible.

                          
                          No I haven't reviewed it yet.  So both are
                          being advanced at the same time?  I had
                          suggested in the past that the Feeds document
                          should go out first, since the Elements doc is
                          the more controversial one and where there is
                          likely to be more disagreement on what is and
                          is not best practice.  Better to get started
                          with the easier doc versus the more
                          contentious one.  I'll try and get some time
                          to go over in detail.

                          

                          
                            
                        
                            

                            

                            -- 

                            Rex Brooks

                            GeoAddress:

                            1361-A Addison

                            Berkeley, CA 94702

                            Phone: 510-898-0670

                            

                          
                    

                    

                  

                

              

            

          
        

        

      

      

    

    

  

Attachment:
cap-elements--v1.0-wd04.doc

Description: MS-Word document

Attachment:
cap-feed-v1.0-wd14.doc

Description: MS-Word document