Yup. That, too.
Ciao,
Rex
At 1:25 PM -0600 4/1/04, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
>I agree with Rick. Don't open liaisons or set dependencies
>on other specifications and standards unless absolutely necessary,
>meaning, your specification can't be used without them.
>
>1. Your specification will be tied to the evolution of the
> other specification, and
>
>2. It might lose.
>
>len
>
>
>From: CONSULTRAC [mailto:]
>
>I think that our attempting to define a "holistic" XML-based ICS 201 is a
>flawed approach and beyond our scope. Perhaps we should prepare an XML-API
>process spec that acknowledges the specific elements and name types
>referenced in the ratified NIMS-construct, but leave the front end
>formatting to the marketplace. In my view this places us where we belong; at
>the "standardized data exchange protocol" level rather than the
>"applications/forms development" level. The latter posture suggests certain
>product biases that I do not think we want attached to the committee's work.
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the
>roster of the OASIS TC), go to
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/emergency/members/leave_workgroup.php.
--
Rex Brooks
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth
W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com
Email:
Tel: 510-849-2309
Fax: By Request
