> While it might be tempting to hard-wire those decisions into a system
> policy on "authorization," such an authoritarian approach could cause
> inflexibility and preclude productive ad-hoc and "emergent"
> processes. Besides, by what authority could anyone be prohibited
> from issuing a warning? Might not that raise a First Amendment issue?
Do we really want the hackers and script kiddies sending biological
alerts, or the old lady sending a 'cat stuck in my tree' CAP alert? :)
There at least has to be one level of human filtering of the alert if it
comes from a source other than the defined 'chain of command'. Just my
2c..
Cheers
Kon
***********************************************************************************
Information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the and destroy the original message.
***********************************************************************************
