Re: [emergency] Interoperability of CAP 1.0 and 1.1 Systems

From
Art Botterell <>
Date
2005-03-11T00:34:12+00:00
ID
p06200702be5695556c03@[10.0.1.4]
Thread
Re: [emergency] Interoperability of CAP 1.0 and 1.1 Systems
Seems like the transformation is direct except for the timeDate part. 
Would it simplify things if we specified a backward-compatibility 
convention for that?  For example:

	"'references' values that refer to messages in the CAP 1.0 format MUST
	use a value of '2000-01-01T00:00:00' for the 'sent' time, regardless
	of the actual 'sent' time of the CAP 1.0 message."

That way new references could be derived directly from the old with 
no additional ambiguity, even if it isn't feasible to refer back to 
the original message body.

- Art