Re: [emergency] EDXL 2-May-2005: Distribution element : IDs

On 17 May 2005, at 22:51, Art Botterell wrote:

> Again, the challenge is to ensure uniqueness while maximizing a) 
> compatibility with users' internal schemes and b) meaningfulness on 
> human inspection.  While we certainly could use UUIDs in either or 
> both these elements (<senderId> and <messageReference>), implementers 
> would then need to deploy some sort of additional lookup mechanism to 
> recover their meanings.  Guess I'm not understanding how UUIDs would 
> be better.

I am saying that both should be defined as URIs (this meets challenges 
A and B).

Cheers...

Dr Renato Iannella
Project Leader, NICTA, Brisbane, QLD, AUSTRALIA
P: +61 7 3000 0484 F: +61 7 3000 0480 M: +61 4 1313 2206
E:  W: http://nicta.com.au


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments may be confidential. They may contain legally
privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy,
use or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended
recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both
messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus,
data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised
amendment. This notice should not be removed.