Makes more sense than having a 'multi purpose' URI field.
However I think it would be useful to maintain the external URI data as
well as having the inline resource with its descriptive file/location
name or element.
Cheers
Kon
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 18:59 -0700, Art Botterell wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2005, at 6/15/05 5:35 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:
> > Since it is used for two different purposes, then it makes more
> > sense to separate into these components
> > of 1) external resource and 2) inline resource.
>
> That makes sense to me, too. Other folks have any comments?
