If we place the reference system in the element name, we will be forced to
expand the specification to include elements for all of the possible
reference systems.
I personally prefer using an attribute, but I would be o.k. with an element
that indicates the spatial reference system as a sub-element of <polygon>
and <circle>.
Patti
Patti Iles Aymond, PhD
Senior Scientist
Bioterrorism Preparedness & Response
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Managing Risk in a Complex World
8555 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 100
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
(225) 952-8228 (phone)
(225) 952-8122 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Art Botterell [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 9:41 PM
To: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC
Subject: Re: [emergency] Re: Circle and Polygon
On Jun 16, 2005, at 6/16/05 7:11 PM, Renato Iannella wrote:
> Perhaps a good compromise is to add explicit (attribute)
> information that indicates the spatial reference system used by the
> element, and that it is the external edge?
We've stayed clear of attributes for various reasons, but would it
achieve the same end to name the elements something like
<wgs84polygon> and <wgs84circle>?
- Art
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE:
http://www.ieminc.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html
