Kon,
Thanks for your comments on the meeting notes, I will add the comment as
you suggest. As for the target area - I encourage all TC members that have
issues with using keyword for the non geo-related targeting to comment on
the list. It is my hope that we can achieve consensus on this topic by the
next TC call.
While putting together the DOM that I posted 6/1, I noticed that
responseType had been removed from the 5/17 draft and put in keyword. This
makes sense to me as a managed list item. I didn't realize this when I
brought it up in the meeting. I did not list it separately in the 5/31
DOM. If anyone has issues with this, please respond to the list.
Thanks,
Elysa Jones, Chair
OASIS EM-TC
Engineering Program Manager
Warning Systems, Inc.
256-880-8702 x102
At 07:12 PM 6/1/2005, Kon Wilms wrote:
> > The document named Draft Meeting Notes 5-31-05.doc has been submitted
>
>I just want to add that on issue 2 there was discussion that the
>definition of targetarea (as it currently appears in the EDXL draft
>document) would be changed in such a way to indicate to implementers
>that the distribution element area keyword can also be used for
>content-targeting of messages.
>
>If keyword is the desired approach then the above would clarify it. I
>see the point to targetarea being geo-related only. I personally prefer
>the suggestion Renato has brought forward which would be that of
>alternate targeting blocks for non-geographic use. This is part style
>(grouping like elements so as not to clutter the distribution header for
>readability purposes) and function (grouping these targets so as to
>allow for tracing content delivery chains at a high level).
>
>Cheers
>Kon
