David,
Not that I could find. It’s “##any”
in the latest document and schema.
Patti
Patti Iles Aymond, PhD
Senior
Scientist
Bioterrorism
Preparedness & Response
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Managing Risk in a Complex World
8555 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 100
Baton
Rouge, LA 70809
(225)
952-8228 (phone)
(225)
952-8122 (fax)
From: Ellis, David
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006
11:21 AM
To: Aymond, Patti; Mark Carlson -
Conneva, Inc.
Cc: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC
Subject: RE: [emergency] RE:
Question on EDXL-DE schema
Patti /Mark
Did we specify “any##” in the
current documentation? The schema values should be ##any and every place
I have looked it is correct. Was there an typographical error in version
7 of the schema?
David E. Ellis
Information Management Architect
(505) 844-6697
From: Aymond, Patti
[mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006
9:18 AM
To: Mark Carlson - Conneva, Inc.
Cc: Emergency_Mgt_TC TC
Subject: [emergency] RE: Question
on EDXL-DE schema
Mark,
I am no schema expert, but I did not have any
problems getting the EDXL-DE to validate in tools that I have (XML Spy is not
one of them). Maybe someone on the TC can offer some suggestions for you.
Welcome to the TC.
Patti
Patti Iles Aymond, PhD
Senior
Scientist
Bioterrorism
Preparedness & Response
Innovative Emergency Management, Inc.
Managing Risk in a Complex World
8555 United Plaza Blvd. Suite 100
Baton
Rouge, LA 70809
(225)
952-8228 (phone)
(225)
952-8122 (fax)
From: Mark Carlson -
Conneva, Inc. [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006
10:34 AM
To: Aymond, Patti
Subject: Question on EDXL-DE
schema
Patti,
I'm a new TC member and am taking my first look at the various
documents and schemas. When I open version 7 of the EDXL-DE schema in XML
Spy, I receive an error stating that
The content model contains the elements <element
name="nonXMLContent"> and <any namespace="any##">
which can not be uniquely determined.
When I remove the "<any namespace="any##"> or
change it to <any
namespace="local##"> the schema validates
successfully.
I understand that this change was introduced recently to support XML
signatures. Do I have something setup incorrectly in XML Spy or is there
something else we need to do to the schema to make it valid.
Mark Carlson
Conneva, Inc.
IEM CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION PLEASE READ OUR NOTICE:
http://www.ieminc.com/e_mail_confidentiality_notice.html
