Re: [emergency] Inconsistency in CAP 1.1 Specification

From
Art Botterell <>
Date
2006-03-07T22:28:03+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [emergency] Inconsistency in CAP 1.1 Specification
Oops.  The "Assess" value should be in the schema, even though it's  
deprecated for public warning applications.  If you need it, maybe we  
should publish an updated schema as an Erratum.

- Art



On Mar 7, 2006, at 3/7/06 1:50 PM, Ham, Gary A wrote:

> In the official CAP 1.1 specification, the value "Assess" is an  
> allowed value for <responseType> per the data dictionary. That  
> value is missing from the schema within the document.  Which is  
> correct?
>
> Gary A. Ham
> Senior Research Scientist
> Battelle Memorial Institute
> 540-288-5611 (office)
> 703-869-6241 (cell)
> "You would be surprised what you can accomplish when you do not  
> care who gets the credit." - Harry S. Truman
>