Makes good sense to me.
Regards,
Rex
At 11:29 PM -0700 4/26/07, Art Botterell wrote:
>Friends -
>
>Sounds like a lot of important details are being picked up here, so
>may I offer a more general suggestion? Is there someplace where it
>is, or could be, stated explicitly that our overriding intent is for
>the ASN.1 and XML codings to represent the same data structure
>interchangeably?
>
>That might seem trivial or obvious, but there's always the
>possibility that some small inconsistency will slip past our
>collective inspection, however thorough. Might it be prudent,
>therefore, to memorialize our overall intent as an added safeguard
>against some accidental artifact being mistaken for intentional at
>some point in the future?
>
>- Art
--
Rex Brooks
President, CEO
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Tel: 510-849-2309
