> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rex Brooks [mailto:]
> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 17:16
> To: Alessandro Triglia; 'Elysa Jones';
> ; Dwarkanath, Sukumar;
> 'Michelle Raymond'
> Subject: Re: [emergency] Considerations on conformance for
> the HAVE standard
>
> Thanks Alessandro,
>
> This satisfies my concerns because a "producer" can apply to
> a hospital, an implementation, e.g. a software tool built to
> produce conforming EDXL-HAVE documents or a service
> contracted to produce conforming EDXL-HAVE documents. I can
> live with the term "message,"
> though it borders on being more vague and more prone to
> different interpretations than I would like, but I can see
> where the ambiguity might actually be useful. I usually
> prefer to reserve the term message for a documents specific
> to a messaging protocol like SOAP
I agree. The current draft uses the term "(HAVE) message". Perhaps "HAVE
document" or "HAVE report" or "report" would be better than "message".
Alessandro
> but all of these usages are
> okay with me.
>
> Cheers,
> Rex
>
