RE: [emergency] RE: Sample email to interested parties WRT geo enhancements to CAP

So in GML one would have something like:

	<abc:Hazard gml:id="g545">
		<abc:location>	
			... could be a GML point, polygon etc.
		</abc:location>
		<abc:alertArea>
			<gml:Polygon>...</gml:Polygon>
		</abc:alertArea>
		<abc:impactArea>
			<gml:Polygon> ... </gml:Polygon>
		</abc:impactArea>
		<abc:type>Earthquake</abc:type>
	</abc:Hazard>


-----Original Message-----
From: Renato Iannella [mailto:] 
Sent: November 21, 2007 3:22 PM
To: Art Botterell
Cc: ; Carl Reed OGC Account
Subject: Re: [emergency] RE: Sample email to interested parties WRT geo
enhancements to CAP


On 22 Nov 2007, at 03:20, Art Botterell wrote:

> One of those ambiguities has to do with whether the CAP Area  
> element describes the area directly affected by a hazard, the  
> location of the hazard itself, or the area to which information  
> about the hazard should be routed.


Don't forget...we also have CAP's big brother EDXL-DE to consider.

Any changes to CAP, should be to make it also work "better" (less  
overlap) with EDXL-DE.

Lots of thinks to think about..enjoy the turkey ;-)

Cheers...  Renato Iannella
NICTA



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php